Should Background Checks Also Be Required at All Gun Shows?

Another firearms show is scheduled soon in Gwinnett.

With another gun show scheduled soon in Gwinnett County, it's time to note a significant feature of such events. Background checks apparently are not required in Georgia and several other states, according to available information.

Large numbers of people flocked to the Gwinnett fairgrounds last weekend for a gun show. The current national discussion of gun control and safety (due to the December shooting in Newtown, Connecticut) was obviously a reason.

However, it also appears to be easier to purchase a firearm in Georgia and other states at a gun show than through a traditional retailer. This is due to the so-called "gun show loophole."

According to wikipedia.org:

Under the terms of the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986, however, individuals "not engaged in the business" of dealing firearms, or who only make "occasional" sales within their state of residence, are under no requirement to conduct background checks on purchasers or maintain records of sale (although even private sellers are forbidden under federal law from selling firearms to persons they have reason to believe are felons or otherwise prohibited from purchasing firearms).

Yes, that would even extend to someone selling a firearm at their private residence, not just a gun show, as gun rights advocates point out.

This situation is what President Obama was targeting when he recently came out with several gun-control proposals. The "universal background checks" would eliminate the so-called loophole, according to cnn.com.

And the situation will arise again soon in Gwinnett. A gun show is scheduled at the North Atlanta Trade Center in Norcross on Febuary 16-17, according to a website.

Also, the attached map/graphic shows that most states are like Georgia -- they do not require background checks at gun shows.--

Should the "gun show loophole" be closed? What are your thoughts on gun rights? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Tim January 30, 2013 at 10:42 AM
"If it is illegal to do so under the Commerce clause of the Constitution, then I say No." Most people do not understand that the Constitution is the Law of the Land. And any illegal effort by the Feds or State to violate that will probably be overturned in Congress or the Courts. Course, I've been wrong before.......once."
Karsten Torch February 02, 2013 at 04:58 PM
I personally have no problem with this, but it is really in violation of the 2nd Amendment to require these. We have no groups being excluded from other Amendments, let's say the 1st. I understand that the government has justified certain exclusions as being OK, but it doesn't mean they are. Full automatic weapons, rocket launchers, and other weapons being excluded really does break the spirit of why the 2nd Amendment was written in the first place, and requiring background checks also sort of breaks the whole "shall not be infringed" part of it. That being said, when I have sold a firearm to an individual myself, I have always required a copy of their voter ID card, this way I can be pretty sure they're not felons. I did this knowing I didn't really have to, it was just my personal rule.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »